SHAREHOLDERS TRY AGAIN TO CONVINCE COURT THAT DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTS In re Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Shareholders Litig. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SHAREHOLDERS TRY AGAIN TO CONVINCE COURT THAT DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTS In re Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Shareholders Litig. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SHAREHOLDERS TRY AGAIN TO CONVINCE COURT THAT DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTS In re Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Shareholders Litig., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SHAREHOLDERS TRY AGAIN TO CONVINCE COURT THAT DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTS In re Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Shareholders Litig.

16 No. 11 ANCODLLR 11Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SHAREHOLDERS TRY AGAIN TO CONVINCE COURT THAT DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTS In re Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Shareholders Litig.

16 No. 11 ANCODLLR 11Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

16 No. 11 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 11
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
March 12, 2001
Duty of Loyalty
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

SHAREHOLDERS TRY AGAIN TO CONVINCE COURT THAT DIRECTORS HAD CONFLICTS

In re Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Shareholders Litig.

Shareholders who are challenging the stock-swap merger of two related natural-resource explorers say they have enough evidence to convince the Delaware Chancery Court that the majority of Freeport-McMoRan Sulphur Inc.'s directors approved merger...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.