SUSPICIONS OF MISMANAGEMENTNOT ENOUGH FORRECORDS INSPECTION Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SUSPICIONS OF MISMANAGEMENTNOT ENOUGH FORRECORDS INSPECTION Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SUSPICIONS OF MISMANAGEMENTNOT ENOUGH FORRECORDS INSPECTION Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SUSPICIONS OF MISMANAGEMENTNOT ENOUGH FORRECORDS INSPECTION Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants

15 No. 13 ANDECLR 8Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SUSPICIONS OF MISMANAGEMENTNOT ENOUGH FORRECORDS INSPECTION Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants

15 No. 13 ANDECLR 8Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 13 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 8
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
April 16, 2001
Books and Records
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

SUSPICIONS OF MISMANAGEMENTNOT ENOUGH FORRECORDS INSPECTION

Mattes v. Checkers Drive-In Restaurants

The suspicions of a Checkers Drive-In Restaurants Inc. shareholder/ex-franchisee about mismanagement and the unequal treatment of franchisees were not enough to convince a Delaware state court judge tolet him look at the franchisor's books. Delaware...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.