'PIZZA EXCLUSION' INVALID, MD. HIGH COURT SAYS Salamon v. Progressive Paloverde Classic Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

'PIZZA EXCLUSION' INVALID, MD. HIGH COURT SAYS Salamon v. Progressive Paloverde Classic Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 'PIZZA EXCLUSION' INVALID, MD. HIGH COURT SAYS Salamon v. Progressive Paloverde Classic Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

'PIZZA EXCLUSION' INVALID, MD. HIGH COURT SAYS Salamon v. Progressive Paloverde Classic Ins. Co.

14 No. 20 ANINSCLR 2Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

'PIZZA EXCLUSION' INVALID, MD. HIGH COURT SAYS Salamon v. Progressive Paloverde Classic Ins. Co.

14 No. 20 ANINSCLR 2Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

14 No. 20 Andrews Ins. Coverage Litig. Rep. 2
Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter
*1 February 27, 2004
Auto
Copyright © 2004 West, a Thomson business.

'PIZZA EXCLUSION' INVALID, MD. HIGH COURT SAYS

Salamon v. Progressive Paloverde Classic Ins. Co.

The Maryland Court of Appeals has reversed a judgment for Progressive Classic Insurance Co., ruling that a “pizza exclusion” used to deny coverage to a delivery man was invalid. Such exclusions, which preclude coverage if an insured driver was...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.