DISCOVERY OF VIDEOTAPE AUDIO REQUIRES NEW TRIAL, OHIO SUP. CT. RULES Manigault v. Ford Motor Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw
https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/Ic42956e15f4411dbbd2dfa5ce1d08a25/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, DISCOVERY OF VIDEOTAPE AUDIO REQUIRES NEW TRIAL, OHIO SUP. CT. RULES Manigault v. Ford Motor Co., Secondary Sources
Westlaw Home
Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select
Sign in
Sign in
Westlaw Home
All content
Search:
Search Westlaw
Search Tips
Advanced
Skip Page Header
DISCOVERY OF VIDEOTAPE AUDIO REQUIRES NEW TRIAL, OHIO SUP. CT. RULES Manigault v. Ford Motor Co.
22 No. 8 ANAUTOLR 6
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 4 pages)
Toggle Menu
DISCOVERY OF VIDEOTAPE AUDIO REQUIRES NEW TRIAL, OHIO SUP. CT. RULES Manigault v. Ford Motor Co.
22 No. 8 ANAUTOLR 6
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 4 pages)
22 No. 8 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 6
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
November 5, 2002
Sudden Acceleration:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications
DISCOVERY OF VIDEOTAPE AUDIO REQUIRES NEW TRIAL, OHIO SUP. CT. RULES
Manigault v. Ford Motor Co.
Briefs and Other Related Documents
The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that a new trial is necessary when expert witness testimony, accompanied by a videotape without sound, is called into question by the audio portion of the tape, even when the audio is discovered after the trial is...
Briefs and Other Related Documents (Back to Top)
(Defendant-Appellee Ford Motor Company's Motion for Reconsideration.), Trial Motion and Memorandum (October 18, 2002)
End of Document
© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
DISCOVERY OF VIDEOTAPE AUDIO REQUIRES NEW TRIAL, OHIO SUP. CT. RULES
Manigault v. Ford Motor Co.
Briefs and Other Related Documents