BANNING E-MAILS OF FORMER EMPLOYEE DOESN'T VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT, SAYS CALIF. APP. CT. Intel Corp. v. Hamidi | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

BANNING E-MAILS OF FORMER EMPLOYEE DOESN'T VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT, SAYS CALIF. APP. CT. Intel Corp. v. Hamidi | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, BANNING E-MAILS OF FORMER EMPLOYEE DOESN'T VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT, SAYS CALIF. APP. CT. Intel Corp. v. Hamidi, Secondary Sources
16 No. 7 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 12
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
December 27, 2001
Constitutional Rights
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

BANNING E-MAILS OF FORMER EMPLOYEE DOESN'T VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT, SAYS CALIF. APP. CT.

Intel Corp. v. Hamidi

A corporation's Internet e-mail system is private property and its owner can prevent a former employee from sending thousands of unsolicited e-mail messages to current employees without violating constitutional guarantees of free speech, a divided...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.