GOVERNMENT ARGUMENTS DEFEATED IN FIRREA CASE Standard Fed. Bank v. United States | Secondary Sources | Westlaw
https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/Ibfa538c0549811dbbe1cf2d29fe2afe6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, GOVERNMENT ARGUMENTS DEFEATED IN FIRREA CASE Standard Fed. Bank v. United States, Secondary Sources
Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select
Sign in
Sign in
All content
Search:
Search Westlaw
Search Tips
Advanced
Skip Page Header
GOVERNMENT ARGUMENTS DEFEATED IN FIRREA CASE Standard Fed. Bank v. United States
12 No. 7 ANMALR 17
Andrews Mergers & Acquisitions Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 3 pages)
Toggle Menu
GOVERNMENT ARGUMENTS DEFEATED IN FIRREA CASE Standard Fed. Bank v. United States
12 No. 7 ANMALR 17
Andrews Mergers & Acquisitions Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 3 pages)
12 No. 7 Andrews Mergers & Acquisitions Litig. Rep. 17
Andrews Mergers & Acquisitions Litigation Reporter
March 2002
Banking (FIRREA):
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications
GOVERNMENT ARGUMENTS DEFEATED IN FIRREA CASE
Standard Fed. Bank v. United States
The Court of Federal Claims has rejected the government's contention that the plaintiff bank in a Winstar case cannot bring a breach-of-contract suit because it is not the real party in interest. The court also ruled in favor of the plaintiff...
End of Document
© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
GOVERNMENT ARGUMENTS DEFEATED IN FIRREA CASE
Standard Fed. Bank v. United States