SETTLEMENT DENYING SUBROGATION RIGHTS NOT VALID AGAINST INSURER Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SETTLEMENT DENYING SUBROGATION RIGHTS NOT VALID AGAINST INSURER Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SETTLEMENT DENYING SUBROGATION RIGHTS NOT VALID AGAINST INSURER Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SETTLEMENT DENYING SUBROGATION RIGHTS NOT VALID AGAINST INSURER Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.

15 No. 12 ANINSCLR 5Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SETTLEMENT DENYING SUBROGATION RIGHTS NOT VALID AGAINST INSURER Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.

15 No. 12 ANINSCLR 5Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 12 Andrews Ins. Coverage Litig. Rep. 5
Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter
*1 December 31, 2004
Auto
Copyright © 2005 Thomson/West .

SETTLEMENT DENYING SUBROGATION RIGHTS NOT VALID AGAINST INSURER

Roberts v. Progressive Northwestern Ins. Co.

The Missouri Court of Appeals has ruled that a settlement signed by two victims of a car accident is not binding on the insurer of the vehicle, clearing the way for the insurer to pursue its subrogation rights against the deceased driver.
Roberts et...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.