INSURER HAS DUTY TO DEFEND IN CELL PHONE CASE, 9TH CIR. RULES VoiceStream Wireless Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

INSURER HAS DUTY TO DEFEND IN CELL PHONE CASE, 9TH CIR. RULES VoiceStream Wireless Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, INSURER HAS DUTY TO DEFEND IN CELL PHONE CASE, 9TH CIR. RULES VoiceStream Wireless Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
22 No. 18 Andrews Toxic Torts Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Toxic Torts Litigation Reporter
*1 October 14, 2004
Radiation
Copyright © 2004 West, a Thomson business.

INSURER HAS DUTY TO DEFEND IN CELL PHONE CASE, 9TH CIR. RULES

VoiceStream Wireless Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co.

Allegations of cell damage can constitute bodily injury for purposes of commercial general liability insurance policies, the 9th Circuit has found. The underlying case involved class-action plaintiffs claiming harmful effects from radio-frequency...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.