4TH CIR. AFFIRMS ACPA VIOLATIONS IN HARRODS DOMAIN NAME CASE Harrods Ltd. v. 60 Internet Domain Names | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

4TH CIR. AFFIRMS ACPA VIOLATIONS IN HARRODS DOMAIN NAME CASE Harrods Ltd. v. 60 Internet Domain Names | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 4TH CIR. AFFIRMS ACPA VIOLATIONS IN HARRODS DOMAIN NAME CASE Harrods Ltd. v. 60 Internet Domain Names, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

4TH CIR. AFFIRMS ACPA VIOLATIONS IN HARRODS DOMAIN NAME CASE Harrods Ltd. v. 60 Internet Domain Names

20 No. 10 ANCOILR 1Andrews Computer & Online Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 4 pages)

4TH CIR. AFFIRMS ACPA VIOLATIONS IN HARRODS DOMAIN NAME CASE Harrods Ltd. v. 60 Internet Domain Names

20 No. 10 ANCOILR 1Andrews Computer & Online Industry Litigation Reporter (Approx. 4 pages)

20 No. 10 Andrews Computer & Online Indus. Litig. Rep. 1
Andrews Computer & Online Industry Litigation Reporter
November 11, 2002
Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

4TH CIR. AFFIRMS ACPA VIOLATIONS IN HARRODS DOMAIN NAME CASE

Harrods Ltd. v. 60 Internet Domain Names

The Fourth Circuit has affirmed a lower court's ruling that 54 Internet domain names that included the HARRODS trademark were registered in bad faith by Harrods Buenos Aires, the former South American arm of the famous British department store. The...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.