EMPLOYERS MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES, SUPREME COURT SAYS Circuit City Stores v. Adams | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

EMPLOYERS MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES, SUPREME COURT SAYS Circuit City Stores v. Adams | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, EMPLOYERS MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES, SUPREME COURT SAYS Circuit City Stores v. Adams, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

EMPLOYERS MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES, SUPREME COURT SAYS Circuit City Stores v. Adams

15 No. 11 ANEMPLR 3Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

EMPLOYERS MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES, SUPREME COURT SAYS Circuit City Stores v. Adams

15 No. 11 ANEMPLR 3Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 11 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
April 3, 2001
Arbitration
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

EMPLOYERS MAY REQUIRE ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES, SUPREME COURT SAYS

Circuit City Stores v. Adams

In what is being considered a major victory for employers, a sharply divided U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that employers may require that workplace disputes be submitted to arbitration, rather than pursued in court. Circuit City Stores Inc. v. Adams,...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.