ILL. FIDUCIARY SHIELD NO PROTECTION FOR SELF-INTERESTED OFFICERS Consumer Benefit Servs. v. Encore Mktg. Int'l | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

ILL. FIDUCIARY SHIELD NO PROTECTION FOR SELF-INTERESTED OFFICERS Consumer Benefit Servs. v. Encore Mktg. Int'l | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ILL. FIDUCIARY SHIELD NO PROTECTION FOR SELF-INTERESTED OFFICERS Consumer Benefit Servs. v. Encore Mktg. Int'l, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

ILL. FIDUCIARY SHIELD NO PROTECTION FOR SELF-INTERESTED OFFICERS Consumer Benefit Servs. v. Encore Mktg. Int'l

18 No. 9 ANCODLLR 6Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

ILL. FIDUCIARY SHIELD NO PROTECTION FOR SELF-INTERESTED OFFICERS Consumer Benefit Servs. v. Encore Mktg. Int'l

18 No. 9 ANCODLLR 6Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

18 No. 9 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 6
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
November 18, 2002
Personal Jurisdiction:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

ILL. FIDUCIARY SHIELD NO PROTECTION FOR SELF-INTERESTED OFFICERS

Consumer Benefit Servs. v. Encore Mktg. Int'l

Illinois' fiduciary shield doctrine did not prevent a federal judge in Chicago from exerting personal jurisdiction over two out-of-state officers of a Delaware-chartered corporation because the lawsuit claims that their improper actions were...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.