DEFENDANTS ASK COURT TO DISMISS HOT-PACK CASE Patterson v. 3M Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

DEFENDANTS ASK COURT TO DISMISS HOT-PACK CASE Patterson v. 3M Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, DEFENDANTS ASK COURT TO DISMISS HOT-PACK CASE Patterson v. 3M Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

DEFENDANTS ASK COURT TO DISMISS HOT-PACK CASE Patterson v. 3M Co.

15 No. 4 ANPRODLLR 8Andrews Product Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

DEFENDANTS ASK COURT TO DISMISS HOT-PACK CASE Patterson v. 3M Co.

15 No. 4 ANPRODLLR 8Andrews Product Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 4 Andrews Prod. Liab. Litig. Rep. 8
Andrews Product Liability Litigation Reporter
*1 May 13, 2004
Hot Pack
Copyright © 2004 West, a Thomson business.

DEFENDANTS ASK COURT TO DISMISS HOT-PACK CASE

Patterson v. 3M Co.

Briefs and Other Related Documents
The defendants in a lawsuit alleging a defective hot pack burned a Philadelphia woman's left breast have asked the court to exclude two of the plaintiff's expert witnesses and dismiss the suit. They argue the plaintiff can offer no proof the pack was...
(Defendants', 3M Company and Walgreen Co., Motion In Limine to Preclude Plaintiff's Experts From Testifying), Trial Motion and Memorandum (2004)
(Memorandum of Law in Support of Defendants', 3M Company and Walgreen Co., Motion In Limine to Preclude Plaintiff's Experts From Testifying), Trial Motion and Memorandum (March 26, 2004)
(Motion For Summary Judgment Of Defendant, 3M Company), Trial Motion and Memorandum (2004)
(Motion For Summary Judgment Of Defendant, Walgreen Co.), Trial Motion and Memorandum (2004)
(Memorandum of Law In Support of Defendant's, 3M Company, Motion For Summary Judgment), Trial Motion and Memorandum (March 26, 2004)
(Memorandum of Law In Support of Defendant's, Walgreen Co., Motion For Summary Judgment), Trial Motion and Memorandum (March 26, 2004)
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.