COURT REFUSES TO ORDER INSURER TO COVER SEX-ABUSE CLAIMS Harden v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER INSURER TO COVER SEX-ABUSE CLAIMS Harden v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, COURT REFUSES TO ORDER INSURER TO COVER SEX-ABUSE CLAIMS Harden v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER INSURER TO COVER SEX-ABUSE CLAIMS Harden v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

14 No. 49 ANINSCLR 9Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER INSURER TO COVER SEX-ABUSE CLAIMS Harden v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

14 No. 49 ANINSCLR 9Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

14 No. 49 Andrews Ins. Coverage Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Reporter
*1 September 17, 2004
Personal Injury
Copyright © 2004 West, a Thomson business.

COURT REFUSES TO ORDER INSURER TO COVER SEX-ABUSE CLAIMS

Harden v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.

In two separate but related decisions, a Georgia appeals court has affirmed declaratory judgment for State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., finding that it had no duty to defend a couple accused of sexual abuse because the harm caused was “intended or...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.