Tenth Circuit Dismisses Appeal to Compel Arbitration for Lack of Jurisdiction under the FAA | Practical Law

Tenth Circuit Dismisses Appeal to Compel Arbitration for Lack of Jurisdiction under the FAA | Practical Law

The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in Grosvenor v. Qwest Corp., dismissed an appeal to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) for lack of jurisdiction. This case demonstrates the jurisdictional limitations placed on federal appellate courts when considering appeals of orders related to arbitration under the FAA. When appealing an order under the FAA, practitioners should ensure that the filings related to the order explicitly seek relief permitted under the statute.

Tenth Circuit Dismisses Appeal to Compel Arbitration for Lack of Jurisdiction under the FAA

by Practical Law Litigation (US)
Published on 16 Aug 2013USA (National/Federal)
The US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, in Grosvenor v. Qwest Corp., dismissed an appeal to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) for lack of jurisdiction. This case demonstrates the jurisdictional limitations placed on federal appellate courts when considering appeals of orders related to arbitration under the FAA. When appealing an order under the FAA, practitioners should ensure that the filings related to the order explicitly seek relief permitted under the statute.
In an August 14, 2013 opinion, Grosvenor v. Qwest Corp., the US Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit dismissed an appeal by Qwest to compel arbitration under the FAA for lack of appellate jurisdiction. The court held that to invoke its jurisdiction under the FAA, the filings underlying the order being appealed must have sought to compel arbitration or stay litigation explicitly, or it must be clear that the movant is seeking such relief.
In December 2009, the plaintiff filed a putative class action against Qwest Corp. in the US District Court for the District of Colorado alleging that Qwest violated its subscriber agreement by raising the price of internet service after registration. Qwest responded to the complaint with a motion to compel arbitration and to stay proceedings, which the district court denied. After discovery, the parties moved for partial summary judgment on whether the parties entered into a valid arbitration agreement. The district court granted the motions for partial summary judgment. The district court found that an agreement existed, but that it was illusory and unenforceable.
On appeal, Qwest argued that the Tenth Circuit had jurisdiction to review the district court's summary judgment order under the FAA because it constituted an appealable order denying a petition to compel arbitration. The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the appeal under the FAA because the summary judgment order did not constitute an order denying a motion to compel arbitration because Qwest failed to either:
  • Move to compel arbitration or stay litigation explicitly under the FAA.
  • Make clear that it sought remedies under the FAA.
The FAA provides that an appeal may be taken from an order denying an application to compel arbitration (9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(C)). Although Qwest had previously filed a motion to compel arbitration in the case, this order was not at issue in this appeal. Instead, Qwest was appealing from an order granting its motion for summary judgment holding that a valid agreement existed between the parties. In its motion or response to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, Qwest did not request the court to compel arbitration or stay the litigation. The Tenth Circuit also held that Qwest had not made an unmistakably clear request to compel in its motion for summary judgment that would have granted the court appellate jurisdiction over the district court's summary judgment order.
Practitioners are reminded that the types of orders that may be appealed under the FAA are limited, and when seeking to appeal an order under the FAA regarding a motion to compel arbitration, it must be clear in the filings underlying the order being appealed that they are moving to compel arbitration or stay litigation explicitly under the FAA.
Court documents: