DAUBERT ‘GENERALITIES' NOT ALWAYS APPLICABLE, RESPONDENT TELLS HIGH COURT Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

DAUBERT ‘GENERALITIES' NOT ALWAYS APPLICABLE, RESPONDENT TELLS HIGH COURT Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, DAUBERT ‘GENERALITIES' NOT ALWAYS APPLICABLE, RESPONDENT TELLS HIGH COURT Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, Secondary Sources
18 No. 1 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
November 3, 1998
Tires
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

DAUBERT ‘GENERALITIES' NOT ALWAYS APPLICABLE, RESPONDENT TELLS HIGH COURT

Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael

Respondent Patrick Carmichael contends in a brief filed with the U.S. Supreme Court that the “general observations” set forth by the high court in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Inc. cannot be universally applied to all expert testimony. Such a “one size...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.