6TH CIR. COMSHARE RULING TAKES MIDDLE GROUND POSITION ON REFORM ACT PLEADING STANDARDS In re Comshare Inc. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

6TH CIR. COMSHARE RULING TAKES MIDDLE GROUND POSITION ON REFORM ACT PLEADING STANDARDS In re Comshare Inc. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 6TH CIR. COMSHARE RULING TAKES MIDDLE GROUND POSITION ON REFORM ACT PLEADING STANDARDS In re Comshare Inc., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

6TH CIR. COMSHARE RULING TAKES MIDDLE GROUND POSITION ON REFORM ACT PLEADING STANDARDS In re Comshare Inc.

14 No. 18 ANCODLLR 3Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 4 pages)

6TH CIR. COMSHARE RULING TAKES MIDDLE GROUND POSITION ON REFORM ACT PLEADING STANDARDS In re Comshare Inc.

14 No. 18 ANCODLLR 3Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 4 pages)

14 No. 18 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
July 26, 1999
Securities Fraud/Post Reform Pleading Standards
Copyright (c) 1999 Andrews Publications

6TH CIR. COMSHARE RULING TAKES MIDDLE GROUND POSITION ON REFORM ACT PLEADING STANDARDS

In re Comshare Inc.

A federal appeals court in Cincinnati, in a middle ground interpretation of the pleading standards set by securities law reform, rejected motive and opportunity as a basis for a securities fraud class action against officers and directors of Comshare...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.