NO DUTY TO DEFEND WHERE EMPLOYER NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR HARASSMENT Minnis v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

NO DUTY TO DEFEND WHERE EMPLOYER NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR HARASSMENT Minnis v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO DUTY TO DEFEND WHERE EMPLOYER NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR HARASSMENT Minnis v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
16 No. 20 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 12
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
June 25, 2002
Insurance:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

NO DUTY TO DEFEND WHERE EMPLOYER NOT VICARIOUSLY LIABLE FOR HARASSMENT

Minnis v. Oregon Mut. Ins. Co.

The Oregon Supreme Court has ruled that, where a sexual harassment complaint could not have imposed vicarious liability on an employer for the misconduct of its manager in an off-site location, the insurer did not have a duty to defend the employer...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.