MARTHA STEWART'S ALLEGATIONS OF JUROR BIAS BASELESS, GOVERNMENT SAYS United States v. Stewart | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I9c5fa081681b11dbbe1cf2d29fe2afe6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default) View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, MARTHA STEWART'S ALLEGATIONS OF JUROR BIAS BASELESS, GOVERNMENT SAYS United States v. Stewart, Secondary Sources

Skip Page Header

MARTHA STEWART'S ALLEGATIONS OF JUROR BIAS BASELESS, GOVERNMENT SAYS United States v. Stewart

19 No. 22 ANCODLLR 12Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

Toggle Menu

MARTHA STEWART'S ALLEGATIONS OF JUROR BIAS BASELESS, GOVERNMENT SAYS United States v. Stewart

19 No. 22 ANCODLLR 12Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

19 No. 22 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 12

Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter

*1 May 3, 2004

Criminal Charges

MARTHA STEWART'S ALLEGATIONS OF JUROR BIAS BASELESS, GOVERNMENT SAYS

United States v. Stewart

Briefs and Other Related Documents

In moving for a new trial, Martha Stewart says the highly publicized juror who said the verdict against her was “a victory for the little guy” was biased because he lied during voir dire. In response, the government says Stewart cannot presume that...

Briefs and Other Related Documents (Back to Top)

(Memorandum of Law in Support of Martha Stewart's Motion for New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33), Trial Motion and Memorandum (March 31, 2004)

(Government's Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Martha Stewart's Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33), Trial Motion and Memorandum (April 07, 2004)

End of Document