Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals | Practical Law

Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals | Practical Law

In Alford v Hannaford [2011] EWCA Civ 1099, the Court of Appeal held that a transfer which granted a right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals.

Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals

Practical Law UK Legal Update 0-509-2400 (Approx. 3 pages)

Right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals

by Practical Law Agriculture & Rural Land
Published on 19 Oct 2011 • England, Wales
In Alford v Hannaford [2011] EWCA Civ 1099, the Court of Appeal held that a transfer which granted a right of way on foot and with vehicles did not include a right to drive animals.