SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN TRADE DRESS/UTILITY PATENT CASE TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN TRADE DRESS/UTILITY PATENT CASE TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN TRADE DRESS/UTILITY PATENT CASE TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN TRADE DRESS/UTILITY PATENT CASE TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays

7 No. 11 ANIPLR 10Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN TRADE DRESS/UTILITY PATENT CASE TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays

7 No. 11 ANIPLR 10Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

7 No. 11 Andrews Intell. Prop. Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter
December 26, 2000
Trade Dress Infringement
Copyright (c) 2000 Andrews Publications

SUPREME COURT HEARS ARGUMENTS IN TRADE DRESS/UTILITY PATENT CASE

TrafFix Devices v. Marketing Displays

The question before the U.S. Supreme Court is simple: Can federal trade dress protection extend to a product covered by an expired utility patent? TrafFix Devices Inc., which wants to manufacture traffic signs based on a design patented by Marketing...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.