ATTORNEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR VALUE OF LOST PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM, BRIEF SAYS Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

ATTORNEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR VALUE OF LOST PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM, BRIEF SAYS Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ATTORNEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR VALUE OF LOST PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM, BRIEF SAYS Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, Secondary Sources
17 No. 21 Andrews Tobacco Indus. Litig. Rep. 11
Andrews Tobacco Industry Litigation Reporter
July 26, 2002
Toxic Chemicals (Malpractice):
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

ATTORNEYS RESPONSIBLE FOR VALUE OF LOST PUNITIVE DAMAGES CLAIM, BRIEF SAYS

Ferguson v. Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein

In their opening brief on the merits to the California Supreme Court, two plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit argue that when it is understood that an attorney guilty of malpractice becomes liable for the value of the lost legal claim, and not for...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.