WHETHER DAMAGES OR BAD FAITH, BROKERAGE DESERVES ATTORNEYS' FEES Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. v. Cantor | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

WHETHER DAMAGES OR BAD FAITH, BROKERAGE DESERVES ATTORNEYS' FEES Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. v. Cantor | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, WHETHER DAMAGES OR BAD FAITH, BROKERAGE DESERVES ATTORNEYS' FEES Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. v. Cantor, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

WHETHER DAMAGES OR BAD FAITH, BROKERAGE DESERVES ATTORNEYS' FEES Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. v. Cantor

16 No. 17 ANCODLLR 17Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

WHETHER DAMAGES OR BAD FAITH, BROKERAGE DESERVES ATTORNEYS' FEES Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. v. Cantor

16 No. 17 ANCODLLR 17Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

16 No. 17 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 17
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
June 4, 2001
Partner Duty
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

WHETHER DAMAGES OR BAD FAITH, BROKERAGE DESERVES ATTORNEYS' FEES

Cantor Fitzgerald L.P. v. Cantor

No matter whether you call it damages or bad faith, the nation's largest bond brokerage deserves at least $11 million to cover the legal costs it incurred because of the “egregious breach of the partnership agreement” by the wife of the brokerage's...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.