PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS WERE NOT FRAUDULENT, MEGO SAYS Feeney v. Mego Mortgage | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS WERE NOT FRAUDULENT, MEGO SAYS Feeney v. Mego Mortgage | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS WERE NOT FRAUDULENT, MEGO SAYS Feeney v. Mego Mortgage, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS WERE NOT FRAUDULENT, MEGO SAYS Feeney v. Mego Mortgage

4 No. 4 ANSLRR 4Andrews Securities Litigation and Regulation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS WERE NOT FRAUDULENT, MEGO SAYS Feeney v. Mego Mortgage

4 No. 4 ANSLRR 4Andrews Securities Litigation and Regulation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

4 No. 4 Andrews Sec. Litig. & Reg. Rep. 4
Andrews Securities Litigation and Regulation Reporter
October 28, 1998
Motion to Dismiss
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

PREPAYMENT ASSUMPTIONS WERE NOT FRAUDULENT, MEGO SAYS

Feeney v. Mego Mortgage

In its motion to dismiss the proposed securities class action filed against it, Mego Mortgage argues the prepayment and default assumptions used by the company to assess the value of its securitized loans were low, but not fraudulent. Robert J....
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.