PLC Global Finance update for August 2009: Germany | Practical Law

PLC Global Finance update for August 2009: Germany | Practical Law

The Germany update for August for the PLC Global Finance multi-jurisdictional monthly e-mail.

PLC Global Finance update for August 2009: Germany

Practical Law UK Articles 4-500-1592 (Approx. 4 pages)

PLC Global Finance update for August 2009: Germany

by Simmons & Simmons
Published on 15 Sep 2009Germany
The Germany update for August for the PLC Global Finance multi-jurisdictional monthly e-mail.

Corporate governance

Modernising German AGMs – the ARUG

Reinhard Bunjes and Sandra Pfister
With effect from 1 September 2009, new rules governing annual general meetings (AGM) of the shareholders of public German stock corporations (Aktiengesellschaften) (AG) allow for a much more flexible handling of the AGMs, including participation by shareholders via electronic media and absentee votes.
The new rules governing AGMs were brought about by the act (Gesetz zur Umsetzung der Aktionärsrechterichtlinie) (ARUG) implementing Directive 2007/36 EC on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies (Shareholder Rights Directive) and will significantly modernise AGMs in Germany.
The Shareholder Rights Directive aims at strengthening sound corporate governance by effective shareholder control and therefore by facilitating and encouraging the use of voting rights associated with shares in listed companies and at giving shareholders equal opportunities to participate in general meetings regardless of where they are residing (that is, how close to the venue of the relevant AGM they live).
In Germany, AGMs were traditionally subject to a somewhat onerous and dated regime that did not cater to the fact that AGMs are the only venue for shareholders to exercise their rights in respect of essential matters of the listed company, such as mergers, issuances of new shares, and so on. So far, the only way for a shareholder to participate in the discussions and decision making in respect of these essential matters has been by attending the AGM in person or sending a proxy to attend.
The ARUG now allows shareholders to exercise their rights in AGMs, be it in part or in whole, via electronic communication and, most importantly, to cast votes in writing or by e-mail. Combined with the electronic broadcasting of AGMs, which has been permissible since 2002, this now allows shareholders to personally participate and exercise their rights in AGMs without having to travel to the venue.
The new rules are optional in nature and, to apply, they must be implemented into a corporation's articles of association.
In addition, the requirements for convening AGMs have been expanded, facilitating shareholders' access to information that they feel they require to make informed decisions in AGMs. Going forward, invitations to AGMs will have to include notifications regarding shareholders' rights to demand amendments to the meeting's agenda and additional information from the corporation and will have to make reference to the corporation's website where information about the AGM will be made available (listed companies will be obliged to make available comprehensive information on their website). Also, whereas specific documents, such as control/profit and loss transfer agreements, and certain information, for example, in respect of re-organisations, had to be put on display or distributed to shareholders under the old regime, it will now suffice for these documents and information to be published on the corporation's website.
In addition, the invitation to the AGM now has to include, among other things, the aggregate amount of shares and voting rights and, if applicable, the forms that have to be used for votes by proxy or absentee votes.
The changes to the Companies Act were published on 4 August 2009 and, for the most part, will enter into force on 1 September 2009. The new rules pertaining to AGMs apply to meetings that are being convened after 1 October 2009.

Financial institutions

German Act relating to the Strengthening of the Financial Markets and Insurance Supervision

Susi Pak and Sandra Pfister
In light of the financial crisis and to prevent future crisis, the German Federal Government has passed the German Act relating to the Strengthening of the Financial Markets and Insurance Supervision (Gesetz zur Stärkung der Finanzmarkt- und der Versicherungsaufsicht) (Act), parts of which have come into force on 1 August 2009. The Act aims, among other things, at strengthening the powers of the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht) (BaFin) to regulate the market.
These enhanced powers include the following.

Preventive powers of BaFin to require a higher liquidity of the banks

The Act expands the authority of BaFin to impose higher capital requirements on institutions, groups of institutions and financial holding groups than those currently required under the German Banking Act (Kreditwesengesetz) (KWG) and the German Solvability Regulation (Solvabilitätsverordnung) (SolvV):
  • To account for those risks that are not or not entirely subject to the SolvV.
  • If the risk-bearing capacity of an institution is not guaranteed.
  • To ensure the set up of an additional equity capital cushion for times of economic downturn.
  • To account for specific business circumstances of an institution, such as the starting of business activities.

Prohibition on the distribution of profits

Up to now, in times of a crisis, BaFin was authorised to prohibit or limit withdrawals by shareholders or distribution of profits to shareholders of institutions only when certain barriers relating to regulatory capital requirements were breached and after the expiry of a specific grace period.
BaFin did not, however, have authority to intervene at an early stage of a crisis or distress.
The Act now provides that BaFin may resort to those measures as soon as an institution's asset position, earnings position or financial standing justifies the assumption that such institution will not be able to permanently fulfil the regulatory capital or liquidity requirements.
In addition, BaFin is now authorised to prohibit or limit disbursements of any kind of profits on equity instruments that are not entirely covered by an annual net profit, in case an institution is effectively in breach of regulatory capital or liquidity requirements. BaFin may also prohibit or limit specific accounting measures. All of these measures apply equally to parent companies (übergeordnete Unternehmen) or financial holding groups and groups of institutions.

Prohibition of payments to affiliated companies

BaFin may prohibit or limit payments to affiliated companies in times of a crisis.

New reporting requirements

The Act imposes new reporting requirements that will ensure that BaFin receives additional information about risk potentials of institutions. Institutions are now required to report specific variations of the so-called modified equity ratio (modifizierte bilanzielle Eigenkapitalquote).
That is the ratio of (a) equity (bilanzielles Eigenkapital) to (b) the sum of balance sheet total (Bilanzsumme), off-balance sheet liabilities (außerbilanzielle Verpflichtungen) and the assumed costs of transforming off-balance sheet liabilities into balance sheet items (Wiedereindeckungsaufwand für Ansprüche aus außerbilanziellen Geschäften).
If, on the basis of an institution's monthly reporting (Monatsausweis), the modified equity ratio varies at least 5% from the ratio calculated on the basis of the latest annual reports, such deviation must be reported to BaFin at the end of each fiscal quarter.

Stricter requirements for members of supervisory boards

It has always been a requirement under applicable German corporate law that members of the supervisory board (Aufsichtsrat) must be reliable and have the relevant expertise to enable them to fulfil their control function and to assess and supervise the business of the relevant enterprise.
Under the Act, BaFin can now demand the dismissal of a member of the supervisory board, prohibit the further exercise of their mandate or even assign all or part of their competences to an appointed special representative, if that member:
  • Does not satisfy the relevant requirements.
  • Fails to detect substantial violations of the principles of proper business management because of the negligent exercise of their control functions.
  • Fails to do everything necessary to rectify existing violations despite a respective warning from BaFin,
In addition, the total number of supervisory board mandates (which are limited to ten under applicable German corporate law) have been reduced to five, unless these entities are members of the same institution related guarantee scheme. Moreover, the Act requires that not more than two former managers (including Geschäftsführer and Vorstände) of an institution may sit on its supervisory board.