FREDERICK'S OF HOLLYWOOD MERGER CHALLENGE TOO SKIMPY, SAYS DEL. HIGH CT. Malpiede v. Townson | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

FREDERICK'S OF HOLLYWOOD MERGER CHALLENGE TOO SKIMPY, SAYS DEL. HIGH CT. Malpiede v. Townson | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, FREDERICK'S OF HOLLYWOOD MERGER CHALLENGE TOO SKIMPY, SAYS DEL. HIGH CT. Malpiede v. Townson, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

FREDERICK'S OF HOLLYWOOD MERGER CHALLENGE TOO SKIMPY, SAYS DEL. HIGH CT. Malpiede v. Townson

17 No. 1 ANCODLLR 9Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

FREDERICK'S OF HOLLYWOOD MERGER CHALLENGE TOO SKIMPY, SAYS DEL. HIGH CT. Malpiede v. Townson

17 No. 1 ANCODLLR 9Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

17 No. 1 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
September 24, 2001
Breach of Duty
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

FREDERICK'S OF HOLLYWOOD MERGER CHALLENGE TOO SKIMPY, SAYS DEL. HIGH CT.

Malpiede v. Townson

A shareholder suit accusing Frederick's of Hollywood Inc.'s board of selling the company too cheaply was too skimpy to prove that the directors breached a duty of loyalty, the Delaware Supreme Court has ruled. It affirmed a lower court ruling...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.