ILLINOIS CONSUMER FRAUD COUNT IS ONLY CLAIM LEFT IN SUZUKI CLASS ACTION Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

ILLINOIS CONSUMER FRAUD COUNT IS ONLY CLAIM LEFT IN SUZUKI CLASS ACTION Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ILLINOIS CONSUMER FRAUD COUNT IS ONLY CLAIM LEFT IN SUZUKI CLASS ACTION Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

ILLINOIS CONSUMER FRAUD COUNT IS ONLY CLAIM LEFT IN SUZUKI CLASS ACTION Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co.

1996 ANAUTOLR 24698Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

ILLINOIS CONSUMER FRAUD COUNT IS ONLY CLAIM LEFT IN SUZUKI CLASS ACTION Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co.

1996 ANAUTOLR 24698Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

1996 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 24698
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
November 19, 1996
Stability
Copyright (c) 1996 Andrews Publications

ILLINOIS CONSUMER FRAUD COUNT IS ONLY CLAIM LEFT IN SUZUKI CLASS ACTION

Connick v. Suzuki Motor Co.

After a ruling by the Illinois Supreme Court, an alleged violation of the Illinois consumer fraud statute is the only count left in an economic damages class action involving the alleged instability of the Suzuki Samurai sportutility vehicle. Connick...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.