OR SUPREME COURT RULES GM HAS BURDEN OF PROOF ON ‘IDIOSYNCRATIC USER’ DEFENSE Jones v. General Motors | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

OR SUPREME COURT RULES GM HAS BURDEN OF PROOF ON ‘IDIOSYNCRATIC USER’ DEFENSE Jones v. General Motors | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, OR SUPREME COURT RULES GM HAS BURDEN OF PROOF ON ‘IDIOSYNCRATIC USER’ DEFENSE Jones v. General Motors, Secondary Sources
1997 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 25436
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
September 2, 1997
Water Leakage
Copyright (c) 1997 Andrews Publications

OR SUPREME COURT RULES GM HAS BURDEN OF PROOF ON ‘IDIOSYNCRATIC USER’ DEFENSE

Jones v. General Motors

In an opinion remanding a Portland policeman's toxic exposure claims against General Motors Corp., the Oregon Supreme Court has rejected an appellate court's conclusion that a plaintiff has the burden of persuasion regarding the “idiosyncratic user”...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.