'FAIR DEBATABILITY' NOT ENOUGH TO DEFEAT BAD-FAITH CLAIMS Sanderson v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

'FAIR DEBATABILITY' NOT ENOUGH TO DEFEAT BAD-FAITH CLAIMS Sanderson v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 'FAIR DEBATABILITY' NOT ENOUGH TO DEFEAT BAD-FAITH CLAIMS Sanderson v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
6 No. 15 Westlaw Journal Insurance Bad Faith 1
Westlaw Journal Insurance Bad Faith
*1 November 30, 2010
Settlement Dispute
Copyright © 2010 Thomson Reuters .

'FAIR DEBATABILITY' NOT ENOUGH TO DEFEAT BAD-FAITH CLAIMS

Sanderson v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Although finding that “fair debatability” is only one factor in the analysis of a bad-faith claim, a Colorado appeals court has ruled that a policyholder failed to establish that a carrier's handling of his underinsured-motorist claim amounted to bad...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.