NO PROOF THAT TESTED APPLICANTS ‘PERCEIVED AS DISABLED,’ SAYS DIVIDED 7TH CIRCUIT EEOC v. Rockwell Int'l Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

NO PROOF THAT TESTED APPLICANTS ‘PERCEIVED AS DISABLED,’ SAYS DIVIDED 7TH CIRCUIT EEOC v. Rockwell Int'l Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, NO PROOF THAT TESTED APPLICANTS ‘PERCEIVED AS DISABLED,’ SAYS DIVIDED 7TH CIRCUIT EEOC v. Rockwell Int'l Corp., Secondary Sources
15 No. 10 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
March 20, 2001
Americans With Disabilities Act
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

NO PROOF THAT TESTED APPLICANTS ‘PERCEIVED AS DISABLED,’ SAYS DIVIDED 7TH CIRCUIT

EEOC v. Rockwell Int'l Corp.

A company's requirement that all job applicants undergo nerve conduction tests before being hired for any of four entry-level positions which required repetitive motion or the use of vibratory power tools does not mean that the applicants were...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.