FACT QUESTIONS ON DEFECTS PUT CASE BACK IN OHIO TRIAL COURT Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

FACT QUESTIONS ON DEFECTS PUT CASE BACK IN OHIO TRIAL COURT Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, FACT QUESTIONS ON DEFECTS PUT CASE BACK IN OHIO TRIAL COURT Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

FACT QUESTIONS ON DEFECTS PUT CASE BACK IN OHIO TRIAL COURT Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA

24 No. 21 ANAUTOLR 4Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

FACT QUESTIONS ON DEFECTS PUT CASE BACK IN OHIO TRIAL COURT Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA

24 No. 21 ANAUTOLR 4Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

24 No. 21 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 4
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
*1 April 19, 2005
Lemon Law (Ohio)
Copyright © 2005 Thomson/West .

FACT QUESTIONS ON DEFECTS PUT CASE BACK IN OHIO TRIAL COURT

Ulrich v. Mercedes-Benz USA

A state appeals court in Ohio has reversed summary judgment for the plaintiff in a lemon law case, finding questions of fact still need to be resolved on whether the alleged problems with a $127,000 Mercedes-Benz meant the vehicle was defective under...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.