INSURER'S SETTLEMENT EFFORTS DIDN'T CONSTITUTE BAD FAITH Boateng v. Geico | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

INSURER'S SETTLEMENT EFFORTS DIDN'T CONSTITUTE BAD FAITH Boateng v. Geico | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, INSURER'S SETTLEMENT EFFORTS DIDN'T CONSTITUTE BAD FAITH Boateng v. Geico, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

INSURER'S SETTLEMENT EFFORTS DIDN'T CONSTITUTE BAD FAITH Boateng v. Geico

21 No. 11 WJINSC 10Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage (Approx. 3 pages)

INSURER'S SETTLEMENT EFFORTS DIDN'T CONSTITUTE BAD FAITH Boateng v. Geico

21 No. 11 WJINSC 10Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage (Approx. 3 pages)

21 No. 11 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 10
Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage
*1 December 17, 2010
Settlement Dispute
Copyright © 2010 Thomson Reuters .

INSURER'S SETTLEMENT EFFORTS DIDN'T CONSTITUTE BAD FAITH

Boateng v. Geico

An insurance carrier did not act in bad faith when it attempted to settle claims stemming from a fatal motor vehicle accident, a Florida federal judge has ruled.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.