PLAINTIFF FAILED TO LINK FIRE TO ALLEGED DEFECT, MICH. CT. RULES Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

PLAINTIFF FAILED TO LINK FIRE TO ALLEGED DEFECT, MICH. CT. RULES Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, PLAINTIFF FAILED TO LINK FIRE TO ALLEGED DEFECT, MICH. CT. RULES Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp., Secondary Sources
24 No. 21 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 3
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
*1 April 19, 2005
Engine Fire
Copyright © 2005 Thomson/West .

PLAINTIFF FAILED TO LINK FIRE TO ALLEGED DEFECT, MICH. CT. RULES

Hastings Mut. Ins. Co. v. Gen. Motors Corp.

A plaintiff who claimed a faulty engine gasket led to a destructive vehicle fire did not prove his case, a state appeals court in Michigan has ruled, affirming dismissal of the action against General Motors Corp.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.