9TH CIR. RULES EXPERT TESTIMONY ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED UNDER DAUBERT McKendall v. Crown Control Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

9TH CIR. RULES EXPERT TESTIMONY ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED UNDER DAUBERT McKendall v. Crown Control Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 9TH CIR. RULES EXPERT TESTIMONY ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED UNDER DAUBERT McKendall v. Crown Control Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

9TH CIR. RULES EXPERT TESTIMONY ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED UNDER DAUBERT McKendall v. Crown Control Corp.

1997 ANAUTOLR 25442Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

9TH CIR. RULES EXPERT TESTIMONY ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED UNDER DAUBERT McKendall v. Crown Control Corp.

1997 ANAUTOLR 25442Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

1997 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 25442
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
September 16, 1997
Fork Lift
Copyright (c) 1997 Andrews Publications

9TH CIR. RULES EXPERT TESTIMONY ERRONEOUSLY EXCLUDED UNDER DAUBERT

McKendall v. Crown Control Corp.

A panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals has reversed summary judgment for manufacturer Crown Control Corp. in a fork lift defect case, ruling that the trial court should not have applied Daubert principles to the testimony of an expert...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.