5TH CIR. RULES PLAINTIFF NOT ‘CONSUMER’ UNDER TX LAW Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

5TH CIR. RULES PLAINTIFF NOT ‘CONSUMER’ UNDER TX LAW Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, 5TH CIR. RULES PLAINTIFF NOT ‘CONSUMER’ UNDER TX LAW Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

5TH CIR. RULES PLAINTIFF NOT ‘CONSUMER’ UNDER TX LAW Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America

17 No. 19 ANAUTOLR 7Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

5TH CIR. RULES PLAINTIFF NOT ‘CONSUMER’ UNDER TX LAW Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America

17 No. 19 ANAUTOLR 7Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

17 No. 19 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
August 4, 1998
Air Bags
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

5TH CIR. RULES PLAINTIFF NOT ‘CONSUMER’ UNDER TX LAW

Chamrad v. Volvo Cars of North America

Finding that the plaintiff lacked standing as a “consumer” under the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Act (DTPA), a panel of the Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals affirmed summary judgment for Volvo in an air bag...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.