CA CT. APP. REFUSES TO DECERTIFY CLASS ACTION OVER ‘FORCED ORDERING'OF COLLATERAL PROTECTION INSURANCE Washington Mutual Bank v. Briseno | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

CA CT. APP. REFUSES TO DECERTIFY CLASS ACTION OVER ‘FORCED ORDERING'OF COLLATERAL PROTECTION INSURANCE Washington Mutual Bank v. Briseno | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, CA CT. APP. REFUSES TO DECERTIFY CLASS ACTION OVER ‘FORCED ORDERING'OF COLLATERAL PROTECTION INSURANCE Washington Mutual Bank v. Briseno, Secondary Sources
4 No. 15 Andrews' Bank & Lender Liab. Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter
April 7, 1999
Class Actions
Copyright (c) 1999 Andrews Publications

CA CT. APP. REFUSES TO DECERTIFY CLASS ACTION OVER ‘FORCED ORDERING'OF COLLATERAL PROTECTION INSURANCE

Washington Mutual Bank v. Briseno

Choice-of-law clauses are not choice-of-forum clauses, and as such do not prevent certification of a nationwide class action, according to the California Court of Appeal. The class action, led by Jayne A. Briseno, claims American Savings Bank (ASB)...
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.