ASSISTANT CAN PURSUE CLAIMS THAT BOSS DEMANDED ORAL SEX Cobb v. Cmty. Action Council | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

ASSISTANT CAN PURSUE CLAIMS THAT BOSS DEMANDED ORAL SEX Cobb v. Cmty. Action Council | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ASSISTANT CAN PURSUE CLAIMS THAT BOSS DEMANDED ORAL SEX Cobb v. Cmty. Action Council, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

ASSISTANT CAN PURSUE CLAIMS THAT BOSS DEMANDED ORAL SEX Cobb v. Cmty. Action Council

22 No. 20 ANEMPLR 7Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

ASSISTANT CAN PURSUE CLAIMS THAT BOSS DEMANDED ORAL SEX Cobb v. Cmty. Action Council

22 No. 20 ANEMPLR 7Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

22 No. 20 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 7
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
*1 May 6, 2008
Sexual Harassment
Copyright © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West .

ASSISTANT CAN PURSUE CLAIMS THAT BOSS DEMANDED ORAL SEX

Cobb v. Cmty. Action Council

A Kentucky appeals court has reinstated the quid pro quo and hostile-environment sexual harassment claims of an administrative assistant who says her boss made oral sex with him a condition of keeping her job.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.