JUDGE REFUSES TO TOSS BAD-FAITH CLAIMS IN ROOF-DAMAGE CASE Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

JUDGE REFUSES TO TOSS BAD-FAITH CLAIMS IN ROOF-DAMAGE CASE Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, JUDGE REFUSES TO TOSS BAD-FAITH CLAIMS IN ROOF-DAMAGE CASE Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

JUDGE REFUSES TO TOSS BAD-FAITH CLAIMS IN ROOF-DAMAGE CASE Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co.

21 No. 15 WJINSC 9Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage (Approx. 3 pages)

JUDGE REFUSES TO TOSS BAD-FAITH CLAIMS IN ROOF-DAMAGE CASE Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co.

21 No. 15 WJINSC 9Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage (Approx. 3 pages)

21 No. 15 Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage 9
Westlaw Journal Insurance Coverage
*1 January 21, 2011
Investigation of Claim
Copyright © 2011 Thomson Reuters .

JUDGE REFUSES TO TOSS BAD-FAITH CLAIMS IN ROOF-DAMAGE CASE

Williams v. Allstate Ins. Co.

A California federal judge has refused to dismiss claims that a homeowners' insurer acted in bad faith by determining a massive windstorm could not have been the cause of its insureds' roof damage.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.