‘CRUCIAL QUESTIONS' NECESSITATE REVERSAL, IND. APP. CT. RULES Rogers v. Cosco Inc. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw
https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I597cb9d05f4511dbbd2dfa5ce1d08a25/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, ‘CRUCIAL QUESTIONS' NECESSITATE REVERSAL, IND. APP. CT. RULES Rogers v. Cosco Inc., Secondary Sources
Westlaw Home
Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select
Sign in
Sign in
Westlaw Home
All content
Search:
Search Westlaw
Search Tips
Advanced
Skip Page Header
‘CRUCIAL QUESTIONS' NECESSITATE REVERSAL, IND. APP. CT. RULES Rogers v. Cosco Inc.
20 No. 7 ANAUTOLR 5
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 3 pages)
Toggle Menu
‘CRUCIAL QUESTIONS' NECESSITATE REVERSAL, IND. APP. CT. RULES Rogers v. Cosco Inc.
20 No. 7 ANAUTOLR 5
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 3 pages)
20 No. 7 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 5
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
January 16, 2001
Child Safety Seat
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications
‘CRUCIAL QUESTIONS' NECESSITATE REVERSAL, IND. APP. CT. RULES
Rogers v. Cosco Inc.
An Indiana appeals court has reversed summary judgment for Cosco Inc. in the case of a child restraint seat that failed to prevent cervical fractures in a 22-month-old girl. The panel identified “crucial questions” regarding express and implied...
End of Document
© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
‘CRUCIAL QUESTIONS' NECESSITATE REVERSAL, IND. APP. CT. RULES
Rogers v. Cosco Inc.