GA SUPREME COURT RULES ‘OPEN AND OBVIOUS' RULE DOES NOT BAR CLAIMS Ogletree v. Navistar Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

GA SUPREME COURT RULES ‘OPEN AND OBVIOUS' RULE DOES NOT BAR CLAIMS Ogletree v. Navistar Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, GA SUPREME COURT RULES ‘OPEN AND OBVIOUS' RULE DOES NOT BAR CLAIMS Ogletree v. Navistar Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

GA SUPREME COURT RULES ‘OPEN AND OBVIOUS' RULE DOES NOT BAR CLAIMS Ogletree v. Navistar Corp.

17 No. 16 ANAUTOLR 10Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

GA SUPREME COURT RULES ‘OPEN AND OBVIOUS' RULE DOES NOT BAR CLAIMS Ogletree v. Navistar Corp.

17 No. 16 ANAUTOLR 10Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 2 pages)

17 No. 16 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
June 16, 1998
Farm Truck
Copyright (c) 1998 Andrews Publications

GA SUPREME COURT RULES ‘OPEN AND OBVIOUS' RULE DOES NOT BAR CLAIMS

Ogletree v. Navistar Corp.

The open-and-obvious danger rule does not preclude product liability claims based on design defects, whether those claims are based on negligence or strict liability, the Georgia Supreme Court has ruled. The court issued the ruling in a suit against...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.