TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS ADMISSIBLE, 8TH CIR. RULES Smith v. BMW N. Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS ADMISSIBLE, 8TH CIR. RULES Smith v. BMW N. Am. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS ADMISSIBLE, 8TH CIR. RULES Smith v. BMW N. Am., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS ADMISSIBLE, 8TH CIR. RULES Smith v. BMW N. Am.

22 No. 9 ANAUTOLR 5Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS ADMISSIBLE, 8TH CIR. RULES Smith v. BMW N. Am.

22 No. 9 ANAUTOLR 5Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

22 No. 9 Andrews Automotive Litig. Rep. 5
Andrews Automotive Litigation Reporter
November 19, 2002
Air Bags:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF'S EXPERTS ADMISSIBLE, 8TH CIR. RULES

Smith v. BMW N. Am.

A federal judge erred in excluding the testimony of two expert witnesses for the plaintiff in an air bag defect case, the 8th Circuit has ruled. The appeals court vacated summary judgment for BMW North America and remanded the matter for trial. Smith...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.