WICCAN NECKLACE CASE WILL PROCEED Hedum v. Starbucks Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

WICCAN NECKLACE CASE WILL PROCEED Hedum v. Starbucks Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, WICCAN NECKLACE CASE WILL PROCEED Hedum v. Starbucks Corp., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

WICCAN NECKLACE CASE WILL PROCEED Hedum v. Starbucks Corp.

22 No. 17 ANEMPLR 4Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

WICCAN NECKLACE CASE WILL PROCEED Hedum v. Starbucks Corp.

22 No. 17 ANEMPLR 4Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

22 No. 17 Andrews Employment Litig. Rep. 4
Andrews Employment Litigation Reporter
*1 March 25, 2008
Retaliation
Copyright © 2008 Thomson/West .

WICCAN NECKLACE CASE WILL PROCEED

Hedum v. Starbucks Corp.

A former Starbucks barista who allegedly was fired for wearing a Wiccan pendant should have a chance to show that the reasons the company gave for her termination were a pretext for discrimination, a federal judge in Oregon has ruled.
End of Document© 2024 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.