DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN EXTENDING CENDANT CLAIM DEADLINE In re Cendant Corp. PRIDES Litig. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN EXTENDING CENDANT CLAIM DEADLINE In re Cendant Corp. PRIDES Litig. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN EXTENDING CENDANT CLAIM DEADLINE In re Cendant Corp. PRIDES Litig., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN EXTENDING CENDANT CLAIM DEADLINE In re Cendant Corp. PRIDES Litig.

15 No. 6 ANDECLR 16Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN EXTENDING CENDANT CLAIM DEADLINE In re Cendant Corp. PRIDES Litig.

15 No. 6 ANDECLR 16Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 6 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 16
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
January 8, 2001
Third Circuit Case Law/Settlement Dispute
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

DISTRICT COURT DID NOT ERR IN EXTENDING CENDANT CLAIM DEADLINE

In re Cendant Corp. PRIDES Litig.

The District of New Jersey did not err in extending the deadline for filing claims in the $340 million settlement of the Cendant PRIDES securities litigation, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has ruled. Circuit Judge Carol Los...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.