IND. APP. CT. FINDS AUTO POLICY AMBIGUOUS ON VEHICLE USE Progressive Ins. Co. v. Harger | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

IND. APP. CT. FINDS AUTO POLICY AMBIGUOUS ON VEHICLE USE Progressive Ins. Co. v. Harger | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, IND. APP. CT. FINDS AUTO POLICY AMBIGUOUS ON VEHICLE USE Progressive Ins. Co. v. Harger, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

IND. APP. CT. FINDS AUTO POLICY AMBIGUOUS ON VEHICLE USE Progressive Ins. Co. v. Harger

13 No. 2 ANINSCLR 5Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Report (Approx. 3 pages)

IND. APP. CT. FINDS AUTO POLICY AMBIGUOUS ON VEHICLE USE Progressive Ins. Co. v. Harger

13 No. 2 ANINSCLR 5Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Report (Approx. 3 pages)

13 No. 2 Andrews Ins. Coverage Litig. Rep. 5
Andrews Insurance Coverage Litigation Report
November 8, 2002
Auto Claims:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

IND. APP. CT. FINDS AUTO POLICY AMBIGUOUS ON VEHICLE USE

Progressive Ins. Co. v. Harger

An Indiana appeals court has affirmed that an insured was entitled to coverage in an auto accident case despite failing to defend a suit by the insurer and that the policy contained conflicting provisions on the use of the vehicle. Progressive...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.