SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW Y2K PATENT CASE Brown v. 3M | Secondary Sources | Westlaw
https://content.next.westlaw.com/Document/I4543235165b711dbbe1cf2d29fe2afe6/View/FullText.html?transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)
View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW Y2K PATENT CASE Brown v. 3M, Secondary Sources
Westlaw Home
Enter to open, tab to navigate, enter to select
Sign in
Sign in
Westlaw Home
All content
Search:
Search Westlaw
Search Tips
Advanced
Skip Page Header
SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW Y2K PATENT CASE Brown v. 3M
8 No. 24 ANIPLR 9
Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 3 pages)
Toggle Menu
SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW Y2K PATENT CASE Brown v. 3M
8 No. 24 ANIPLR 9
Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter
(Approx. 3 pages)
8 No. 24 Andrews Intell. Prop. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Intellectual Property Litigation Reporter
May 14, 2002
Patents:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications
SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW Y2K PATENT CASE
Brown v. 3M
The U.S. Supreme Court will not review a Federal Circuit decision that affirmed the invalidity of a patent for a Y2K remediation method. Brown v. 3M et al., No. 01-917, cert. denied (U.S., Apr. 1, 2002).
Plaintiff Roger W. Brown owns
U.S. Patent No....
End of Document
© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.
SUPREME COURT DECLINES TO REVIEW Y2K PATENT CASE
Brown v. 3M