STATE LAW DOES NOT CONFER U.S. JURISDICTION IN ILL. TAXPAYER CASE Rifkin v. Bear Stearns & Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

STATE LAW DOES NOT CONFER U.S. JURISDICTION IN ILL. TAXPAYER CASE Rifkin v. Bear Stearns & Co. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, STATE LAW DOES NOT CONFER U.S. JURISDICTION IN ILL. TAXPAYER CASE Rifkin v. Bear Stearns & Co., Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

STATE LAW DOES NOT CONFER U.S. JURISDICTION IN ILL. TAXPAYER CASE Rifkin v. Bear Stearns & Co.

7 No. 7 ANDERLR 8Andrews Derivatives Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

STATE LAW DOES NOT CONFER U.S. JURISDICTION IN ILL. TAXPAYER CASE Rifkin v. Bear Stearns & Co.

7 No. 7 ANDERLR 8Andrews Derivatives Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

7 No. 7 Andrews Derivatives Litig. Rep. 8
Andrews Derivatives Litigation Reporter
May 7, 2001
Yield Burning
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

STATE LAW DOES NOT CONFER U.S. JURISDICTION IN ILL. TAXPAYER CASE

Rifkin v. Bear Stearns & Co.

An Illinois statute allowing citizens to sue on behalf of a municipality cannot be used to confer federal jurisdiction in a taxpayer's “yield burning” suit against broker-dealer Bear Stearns & Co., the Seventh Circuit has ruled. Rifkin et al. v. Bear...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.