FRAUD CONVICTION REMANDED FOR CONFLICTING TESTIMONY United States v. Barile | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

FRAUD CONVICTION REMANDED FOR CONFLICTING TESTIMONY United States v. Barile | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, FRAUD CONVICTION REMANDED FOR CONFLICTING TESTIMONY United States v. Barile, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

FRAUD CONVICTION REMANDED FOR CONFLICTING TESTIMONY United States v. Barile

7 No. 10 ANHCFLR 9Andrews Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

FRAUD CONVICTION REMANDED FOR CONFLICTING TESTIMONY United States v. Barile

7 No. 10 ANHCFLR 9Andrews Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

7 No. 10 Andrews Health Care Fraud Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Health Care Fraud Litigation Reporter
June 2002
Trial Evidence:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

FRAUD CONVICTION REMANDED FOR CONFLICTING TESTIMONY

United States v. Barile

A federal appellate court has remanded the case of a man who was convicted of making false statements to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration while working for a medical device manufacturer. United States v. Barile, No. 00-4926 (4th Cir., Apr. 18,...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.