COURT FINDS NO SUPPORT FOR CLAIM OF RIGHT TO ELECT DIRECTORS McIlquham v. Feste | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

COURT FINDS NO SUPPORT FOR CLAIM OF RIGHT TO ELECT DIRECTORS McIlquham v. Feste | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, COURT FINDS NO SUPPORT FOR CLAIM OF RIGHT TO ELECT DIRECTORS McIlquham v. Feste, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

COURT FINDS NO SUPPORT FOR CLAIM OF RIGHT TO ELECT DIRECTORS McIlquham v. Feste

17 No. 14 ANCODLLR 14Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

COURT FINDS NO SUPPORT FOR CLAIM OF RIGHT TO ELECT DIRECTORS McIlquham v. Feste

17 No. 14 ANCODLLR 14Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

17 No. 14 Andrews Corp. Off. & Directors Liab. Litig. Rep. 14
Andrews Corporate Officers and Directors Liability Litigation Reporter
March 11, 2002
Director Election:
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

COURT FINDS NO SUPPORT FOR CLAIM OF RIGHT TO ELECT DIRECTORS

McIlquham v. Feste

A Delaware state court judge said it became clear at a trial last month that a major shareholder of Malachi Mattress America was at best sincerely mistaken about his right to elect a majority of the unit's directors even after Sealy Corp. acquired a...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.