COURT BARS EXPERTS IN RADIATION EXPOSURE CASE, DISMISSES CLAIMS UNDER PRICE-ANDERSON Good v. Fluor Daniel Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

COURT BARS EXPERTS IN RADIATION EXPOSURE CASE, DISMISSES CLAIMS UNDER PRICE-ANDERSON Good v. Fluor Daniel Corp. | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, COURT BARS EXPERTS IN RADIATION EXPOSURE CASE, DISMISSES CLAIMS UNDER PRICE-ANDERSON Good v. Fluor Daniel Corp., Secondary Sources
24 No. 24 Andrews Asbestos Litig. Rep. 6
Andrews Asbestos Litigation Reporter
October 10, 2002
Toxic Chemicals (Expert Testimony):
Copyright (c) 2002 Andrews Publications

COURT BARS EXPERTS IN RADIATION EXPOSURE CASE, DISMISSES CLAIMS UNDER PRICE-ANDERSON

Good v. Fluor Daniel Corp.

A federal court in Washington has rejected as unreliable the expert testimony submitted by nuclear workers who were allegedly exposed to radiation as a result of a chemical explosion at a plutonium finishing plant.Good et al. v. Fluor Daniel Corp. et...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.