OHIO APP. CT. USES DEL. LAW TO DECIDE DEAL DID NOT HURT MINORITY Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

OHIO APP. CT. USES DEL. LAW TO DECIDE DEAL DID NOT HURT MINORITY Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, OHIO APP. CT. USES DEL. LAW TO DECIDE DEAL DID NOT HURT MINORITY Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

OHIO APP. CT. USES DEL. LAW TO DECIDE DEAL DID NOT HURT MINORITY Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites

15 No. 20 ANDECLR 9Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

OHIO APP. CT. USES DEL. LAW TO DECIDE DEAL DID NOT HURT MINORITY Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites

15 No. 20 ANDECLR 9Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

15 No. 20 Andrews Del. Corp. Litig. Rep. 9
Andrews Delaware Corporate Litigation Reporter
July 23, 2001
Entire Fairness
Copyright (c) 2001 Andrews Publications

OHIO APP. CT. USES DEL. LAW TO DECIDE DEAL DID NOT HURT MINORITY

Huang v. Lanxide Thermocomposites

An Ohio appeals court, applying Delaware corporate law, decided that the majority shareholders of a troubled refractory technology company did not receive an unfair benefit at the expense of the minority sale. Therefore, neither they nor the deal...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.