LAW FIRM'S FAULTY HANDLING OF COMPLAINT WAS MALPRACTICE Tri-G Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

LAW FIRM'S FAULTY HANDLING OF COMPLAINT WAS MALPRACTICE Tri-G Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver | Secondary Sources | Westlaw

View on Westlaw or start a FREE TRIAL today, LAW FIRM'S FAULTY HANDLING OF COMPLAINT WAS MALPRACTICE Tri-G Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver, Secondary Sources
Skip Page Header

LAW FIRM'S FAULTY HANDLING OF COMPLAINT WAS MALPRACTICE Tri-G Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver

10 No. 16 ANBLLLR 10Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

LAW FIRM'S FAULTY HANDLING OF COMPLAINT WAS MALPRACTICE Tri-G Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver

10 No. 16 ANBLLLR 10Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter (Approx. 3 pages)

10 No. 16 Andrews' Bank & Lender Liab. Litig. Rep. 10
Andrews' Bank & Lender Liability Litigation Reporter
*1 January 4, 2005
Malpractice
Copyright © 2005 Thomson/West .

LAW FIRM'S FAULTY HANDLING OF COMPLAINT WAS MALPRACTICE

Tri-G Inc. v. Burke, Bosselman & Weaver

In a ruling of first impression, the Illinois Appellate Court has awarded compensatory damages in a malpractice suit that included punitive damages from the underlying claim. The appellate panel held that, since the client would have prevailed in the...
End of Document© 2023 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.